ST85
180 C-Face mount, 1.35" thin encoder. 2.875" max bore size. Wide air gap, single or dual isolated output options. Up to 2,048 PPR.
Learn More
Other Categories
Optical Rotary Encoders
Magnetic Rotary Encoders
Hollow-Shaft Encoders
Hub-Shaft Encoders
Shaft Encoders
Miniature Encoders
Hazardous Area Encoders
Non Contact Encoders
Bearingless Encoders
Ethernet Protocol Encoders
Service & Support Overview
Product Quicklinks
Competitor Parts List
Discontinued Encoder Guide
Literature Library
RMA Request
Technical Support
Product Manuals & Installation Guides
Knowledge Center
Technology
How to Choose Feedback
Application Examples
Case Studies
Encoder Issues and Troubleshooting
White Paper Downloads
Literature Library
Power Point Downloads
Videos
Featured Links
Motor Encoders
Quadrature Encoders
Optical Encoders
Magnetic Encoders
How to Specify a Resolver
Draw Wire Encoders
Hall Effect Encoders
Encoder Accuracy vs Resolution
Depending on the application, there are several reasons why using a bearingless encoder may be more suitable than a shaft encoder. There are several benefits to each, which makes them ideal for different applications depending on your requirements.
Watch Dynapar's video on the "Benefits of Bearingless Encoders" where we showcase our RIM Tach 8500 NexGen and our New SLIM Tach ST56 bearingless encoders.
There are several different applications for bearingless encoders, depending on what you need them for. If you need an encoder for a harsh environment, bearingless encoders are often used in applications such as pulp and paper mills and outdoor applications where contaminants, extreme temperatures, shock, and vibration are present. Without bearings included in the encoder design, this also means there is one fewer item that can fail over time as a result of wear.
Applications for shaft encoders, on the other hand, include a range of less adverse environments that require feedback solutions with flexible mounting options. In many cases, design engineers will use these encoders, but bearingless encoders may be better suited to avoid gradual wear and survive contaminated environments.
While some applications may call for a shaft encoder, it can be an additional point of failure in harsh applications that demand maximum reliability. Dynapar bearingless encoders also use magnetic sensing technology which is far less susceptible to dirt, grease or water impacting the quality of feedback as compared to a shaft encoder using optical sensing technology where these contaminants can impair the optical encoder’s code disc.
© Copyright Dynapar 2024 All Rights Reserved